I found the intro of this piece more pretty than the rest of it, so I just did the intro. I spliced together two takes because one of them has Bennett showing up, but I flubbed the second part a little. This only took a couple of days of practice.
I found the intro of this piece more pretty than the rest of it, so I just did the intro. I spliced together two takes because one of them has Bennett showing up, but I flubbed the second part a little. This only took a couple of days of practice.
I've since added an 84" perforated drop down projector screen from Vividstorm and a Valerion Visionmaster Pro (1). I use the screen for movies and the TV for video games and shows.
At a viewing distance of 7.5', the perforations are noticeable and there's some moire effect on scenes with bright solid colors, but I prefer being able to keep the center channel higher. There's a bit of audible degradation for the center channel even after re-calibration, but it's pretty slight. I'd prefer a woven screen, but I wasn't able to find one at this size and was a tensioned drop down that wasn't multiple thousands of dollars. Understandably, projector screens usually come in larger sizes.
I also added the costs to the equipment list at the bottom.
So, I've been upgrading my home theater. Some pictures:
It all started when my 12-year old Panasonic plasma television died. I hadn't been using the television very often, so I replaced it with a relatively cheap 55" Hisense U7N. But it turns out that even cheap TVs with HDR look really good compared to an old plasma suffering from burn-in.
So, I decided to get a 4K capable receiver, only to discover reconnecting my speakers that my small subwoofer had died at some point, too. Well, I had gotten that 14 years ago, so maybe it was time to get a real subwoofer, one that I would definitely notice if it died. And since the receiver supported Atmos, maybe while I was at it, I'd get some height speakers.
As it turned out, I found I really enjoyed the new subwoofer and Atmos, so over the course of six months or so, I slowly researched what else I could do to improve my home theater experience. Using a calibrated mic. Acoustic treatment. Tactile transducers. A second subwoofer. It was a real "if you give a mouse a cookie" situation, as my wife would describe it. And now here I am writing about my home theater journey, in case it is helpful or interesting to anyone.
TV or projector? I prefer TVs due to their ability to be used in more lighting conditions. The main downsides are that they are much smaller and you can't place speakers behind a TV, unlike an acoustically transparent screen.
A 55" TV from my seating position at 7 feet occupies about 32 degrees horizontally. It's a little large for normal shows, which I rarely watch; about the right size for games; but a little small for movies, my primary use case, which normally target 45 degrees. I would go 65" or 77" next time.
OLED has the best picture quality but has burn-in issues and are more expensive than mini-LED. Most people will say there is a negligible amount of burn-in after 5 years, but I like to keep devices until they completely die and had my last TV for 12 years. I spent the last few of those years with a burned in image, so I decided to go mini-LED. A quick visit to the excellent TV review site rtings.com and I ordered the Hisense U7N.
After discovering that the new TV looked amazing compared to my 12-year old plasma with burn-in, I decided it was time to get a 4K capable receiver. I went with a Denon AVR-X3800H.
I'm of the opinion that a receiver's effect on sound quality is pretty minimal so long as the receiver supports good calibration options and sufficient power, so it's mostly a matter of features. I went with Denon because I had the impression that they were slightly more reliable than Onkyo and Integra. The X3800H has the better Audyssey XT32 sound calibration and is the cheapest Denon with multiple independent subwoofer outputs. While I wasn't initially planning on getting multiple subwoofers, I had heard so much about the benefits of multi-sub and figured it would be nice just in case without needing to buy a separate device like a MiniDSP.
The choice ended up being very good for me as I did eventually get another sub, tactile transducers (which uses another one of the 4 sub outputs), and ended up really liking some sound calibration software called A1 Evo, which only works with Denon and Marantz receivers.
When hooking things up to the new receiver, I realized my subwoofer was dead. It was a small 8" Aperion Bravus I bought when I lived in a condo that only went down to 35hz at -3db.
Given that I didn't even know when it died and now that I live in a house, I decided to get a subwoofer with much more impact. I wanted it to go to at least 20hz and I wanted it ported because, while the listening area is fairly small, it was part of a much larger basement and ported subwoofers just have more output. I also needed it to take up less than 20" x 20" horizontally to give me more options for where it could be placed. The Hsu Research VTF-TN1 met all this criteria, though it turned out that I only need to turn its gain up to roughly 25%, so probably I could've gone with a sealed sub.
Experimenting with various locations, I found I was happiest with it nearfield, directly behind the main listening position.
So, how much difference does a real subwoofer make? A lot. I had some bass demos, and one of the clips is the Gas Station attack scene from Terminator Salvation. I was not very impressed with that scene with the old system--I guess it had nice explosions. What I hadn't realized was that my old system had actually failed the bass test and that you were supposed to feel the giant terminator walking around.
My speakers at the time was a 5.1 setup using the Aperion Intimus line. 4T towers for LR, 4C center, and 4B surrounds. They were really good for the price, but sounded a little thin at louder volumes in the larger basement.
I considered getting more Aperions, but doing more research, found that they don't usually measure that well. Objective measurements don't tell the full story as people don't hear the same way a microphone does, but speakers that measure well rarely sound bad and I appreciate the scientific approach. I wasn't sure about getting more speakers that measured poorly even if they did sound pretty good to my ears, but I also did not want to go through the hassle of selling my existing speakers and definitely didn't want to just throw them away.
So, I decided to take a risk and do a mix and match. I bought speakers from Ascend Acoustics, who publishes measurements. Normally, you want speakers all from the same brand so that, as a sound pans around, it doesn't shift in timbre. I got a pair of Sierra LX for the left and right speakers, a Sierra-2EXv2 for the center, and a pair of HTM-200SE2 for the front heights. I moved the Aperion 4Ts that were the previous left and right speakers to be surrounds, and the Aperion 4Bs to be the rear heights.
There is a small timbre difference after doing speaker calibration, but it doesn't bother me. Very similar to the timbre difference between the Sierras and the HTM-200SE2s, actually.
The Ascends are excellent and have no thinness problem.
A common question is whether Atmos speakers are worth it. It's a pretty subjective question that depends on your priorities. I find well-done Atmos effects a lot of fun when they happen, but it is also true that this is only present for maybe 20% of content that I listen to and typically for a small portion of it. When it happens, though, it's really cool and it happens often enough that I consider it worth it.
I did experiment with the speaker position. The "heights" position have the speakers closer to the walls and less directly above you, whereas the "tops" position is more above you. I felt there were trade-offs and neither are clearly superior. There's often action happening on the screen that pans up, and heights just sound more natural when that happens. However, if there is something panning from front to back above you, or if it's something like rain on a rooftop, the tops are much more convincing.
In the end, I kept the tops position because it was more fun.
So, I mentioned that being able to feel the action was game changing. However, I experienced two problems:
Tactile transducers are devices that connect to your seating or platform and directly impart movement. I got a pair of Earthquake MQB-1s with an XJ-300ST amp and it solved both problems. The Denon X3800H receiver can be configured to set one of the subwoofer outputs to tactile transducer, which both allows you to set a separate high-pass filter and avoid using that output during calibration.
About 30% of the apparent sound quality has to do with the room, so I was curious how my system measured and whether there were any issues with the room. I also strongly suspected that having a wall on the right side but none on the left made for an imbalance.
So, I bought a calibrated microphone (Umik-1) and took measurements with this excellent and free software called Room EQ Wizard. I found the decay time to be pretty decent, with some room for improvement above the bass level, and a lot of room for improvement at bass frequencies.
Standard advice is to prioritize treating first reflection points and corners. I bought some 244 panels and a 6A Alpha Pro from GIK Acoustics online and found a couple of their tri-traps on Craiglist.
Treating the first reflection point in the side wall and the rear wall made a very noticeable difference in the sound. At first, it sounded pretty bad. Turns out, you should re-run speaker calibration or else things will sound weird. After doing that, things we much improved. The soundstage was made less wide, but imaging was considerably improved. Decay times improved some, but the perceptual effect was greater than what the graphs would imply.
Treating the ceiling did not affect the soundstage, but surprised me by also improving the imaging, even for content that did not use heights. It gave sounds a much more distinct vertical location. I thought that vertical imaging did not matter for non-Atmos content because there aren't speakers with different vertical positioning to image with, but it was nice to have things like voices sound like they come from a more distinct point than sounding smeared vertically.
Treating the corners made some small improvements to bass decay time, but I discovered later that it's much easier to treat bass issues with multiple subwoofers. I'm not sure I would recommend treating corners if you haven't tried multiple subs already.
If I was so happy with the Hsu and only had its gain at 25%, why would I want another subwoofer? Higher quality bass. It's hard to get an even bass response with a single subwoofer for a single seating position. It's impossible to do so across multiple seating positions. Things sounded bloated at the right side of the couch.
I got a Speedwoofer 10s Mk2 which only goes to about 22hz. But as my issues with peaks and dips were above 30hz, it did just fine to flatten the bass response across multiple listening positions.
While I prioritize audio over video, I did find it distracting that the walls were yellow. So, I painted them the most neutral and non-reflective gray possible, a flat Sherwin Williams Westchester Gray.
I had also transferred some LED bias lights from my old TV to the new one, but found they were a little too bright. So, I got some MediaLight Mk2 lights, which are dimmable and have high CRI, and found they were an improvement as well. I find having bias lighting to reduce eye strain in high contrast situations.
I had bought the Audyssey app but ultimately had trouble getting the bass dialed in so that there was both enough impact and no sign of bloat on some test tracks involving acoustic bass. I had heard about A1 Evo from forums and decided to try it out. While it was a little confusing figuring out how to get the right sweep measurements, eventually I figured out that you can just use the odd.wtf script and generate sweeps with the standard Audyssey mic hooked up to the receiver.
The results from A1 Evo sound better than whatever I tried with the Audyssey app and solved my bass bloat problem, so I recommend it.
A little devil on my shoulder kept on whispering that 7 bed layer speakers might be noticeably better than just 5. So, I got another pair of HTM-200SE2s for use as rear surrounds an and AIYIMA A07 amp to power them.
There's not a lot of movie content where having sound directly behind you is important. I did find that surround effects seem more enveloping than in my 5.1 setup. For video games, however, rear surrounds are utilized far more actively where there can be a lot happening behind you and it's useful to get accurate positioning information.
Overall, it's nicer but not a big deal compared to properly set up 5.1.
Originally, I bought a Panasonic 420 because I figure since I did not have an OLED, probably I wouldn't care a lot about Dolby Vision. The internet suggests that actually it's the opposite, where the worse the TV is, but more Dolby Vision is beneficial. At any rate, I almost never actually play physical discs because I saw how many people complained about minor scratches messing up their 4K so I pursued a way to transfer them to disk. And I discovered later that I don't really care about Dolby Vision over normal HDR.
I ended up getting an Ugoos AM6b+ and installed CoreElec. It's one of the few players that supports all versions of Dolby Vision and lossless audio. I stream from my Synology 923+ using Eero Pro 6E with wireless backhaul. I had initially tried very hard to get it working with my FireTV Stick and thought I did not have enough network bandwidth and got an ethernet adapter and a long cable, but it turns out the FireTV Stick just isn't powerful enough to handle really high bitrates.
I rip discs using MakeMKV and a Verbatim 43888 that I bought from Amazon.co.uk.
At this point, the home theater is pretty much complete. I might get some diffusion panels for the ceiling and back, but they're more expensive than absorption panels. Whenever my current TV dies again, I will go for a 65" or 77" instead.
Prices are rounded but include tax.
Total: $13,290, plus a little more for wire, speaker mounts, media console
This is a personal question. Not just due to personal taste and budget, but also simply physical limitations. There's no point in getting more if you can't hear the difference unless you are trying to impress others for some reason. I used to be able to distinguish in a double-blind test the difference between a well-encoded 192kbps MP3 and a lossless track in college, but I can't do so any more. Even if you can hear the difference, you may not care about some types of differences.
But it's a hassle to audition equipment. How will you discover your limits without spending too much time and money? How can you figure out what you care about?
One trick is that headphones are much more convenient to try out and cost about 10x less for roughly the same quality of sound. You won't get really get body-shaking bass impact, though.
As for figuring out what you care about, ready some testing tracks and clips that are a combination of your favorites that you are intimately familiar with and reference material that others agree are high quality and can stress some particular aspect of video or sound.
Standard advice is to use what you are familiar with, but what if what you are familiar with isn't particularly good for evaluating things? It can be helpful to learn about what others use and what specifically they look for. I used a lot more than just these, but some that I thought were particularly helpful:
While I purchase a lot of discs, I rarely use the actual Blu-Ray player. I got a bit paranoid about disc scratches and instead use MakeMKV and a Verbatim 43888 to rip the discs to my NAS (a Synology 923+). For a while, I was trying to get my FireTV Stick 4k to play back the files, but it was choppy. I thought it was due to poor network bandwidth, so I upgraded my wireless to Eero 6E routers, which improved but did not solve the playback problems. Eventually, I eliminated the network as the bottleneck via an ethernet adapter and a long cable and purchased an Ugoos AM6b+. It's the most common device that can playback all Dolby Vision formats and lossless audio, though it turns out that I don't really care about Dolby Vision over standard HDR.
I discovered this piece while looking for music to play in the background of my wife's D&D campaign. We had heard rumors of a haunted piano bar, so I looked for ghost-themed music and came across Bolcom's 3 Ghost Rags. I had played the Graceful Ghost when I was much younger, but hadn't realized it was part of a series of 3.
The piano bar ended up not being haunted, but instead was in a time loop. When the three rags played all the way through, the loop would end with a catastrophic meteor strike killing everyone in the bar and we'd start again and had to figure out how to escape the loop. It ended up being because the pianist had made a deal with a demon to become the "greatest pianist of all time" and we had to destroy the piano and then defeat a crazy aberration hidden in the basement.
Anyway, I really liked "Poltergeist", so I decided to learn it. The ending could be... a little more polished, but I decided this take was good enough. It's got a cat, after all.
We had some flight vouchers from a cancelled trip that we had to use and my wife and I happened to both have time off in the summer, and of course our 7-year old son was out of school. Summers in western Washington are great, so where could be fly to that was at least as good but wouldn't exceed the cost of our vouchers? We decided on Glacier National Park, as it's only fully open during the summer. This is a trip report. Most of the pictures are of animals since after I switched to telephoto lens, I usually did not switch back to something that could take landscapes.
Since none of our family are avid hikers, we did a series of training hikes near where we lived that I thought were very important to prepare us, especially for Grinnell Glacier.
I would say that I thought that Mt. Pilchuck and Little Bandera would normally be more technically challenging than Grinnell, though shorter, but as you'll see later in Day 4, nature decided to up the challenge.
Downloading offline maps for Google Maps and the official NPS app proved very handy for navigating.
We found out that SeaTac airport was under some sort of cyberattack. When we checked in at home online, we were advised that checked bags may not make it to the destination. We had planned to check a bag because hiking poles are not officially allowed on flights. However, we had read online that often TSA lets them through if they are fully disassembled, so we decided to risk bringing them in carry-on.
Security did let us through with hiking poles.
A second hiccup was that the rental car agency, Alamo, did not have any compact SUVs available, which was the option we had booked. We had to decide between a full size car, a pickup, or a minivan. There was some concern about the conditions of the roads which had made us prefer a compact SUV, but after doing some research on the phone, we found that the roads were either fully paved or pretty well-kept gravel that anything other than a sports car would be able to handle and that the bigger risk was that large vehicles would find parking and going through the narrow parts of Going-to-the-Sun Road more challenging. So we went with the car for the best fuel efficiency.
We messaged our AirBnB hostess whether or not they had bear spray we could borrow at the place in Whitefish, and she let us know that some previous guests had left some. They had also left bug spray. We bought food for breakfasts and lunches and sunscreen that we were originally planning to bring in the checked bag.
We had heard that parking was dicey at Logan Pass unless you got there before 6:30 AM and we didn't really want to get up early enough to try that. So, instead we aimed for getting the express shuttles at Apgar visitor center. We got in line at 7:35 AM and got on the fourth shuttle at 8:25 AM. It was technically not "express", because it made stops along the way, but still one of the smaller shuttles that went all the way to Logan Pass without a need for a transfer.
Hidden Lake was my wife's favorite hike. Beautiful peaks, meadows, trees, and of course, the lake. We saw a good amount of wildlife. The descent to the lake and the climb back up was pretty steep, but nothing like Bandera in Washington state that our family had done before.
| Bighorn sheep |
| Golden-mantled squirrel |
| Blue Copper butterfly? |
| Mormon "Cricket" |
| Hoary Marmot |
| Columbian Ground Squirrel. Video of one chirping. |
| American Pipit |
| Townsend's Warbler |
| Rocky Mountain Parnassian |
| Mountain Chickadee |
| Pine Siskin |
| Western White butterfly |
| Mountain Goat |
My wife was not enthusiastic about the plan to drive from Whitefish to Many Glacier early in the morning to do Grinnell Glacier on Wednesday, so she checked for cancellations at Many Glacier hotel or Swiftcurrent Motor Inn and found one! So, on this day we drove the Going-to-the-Sun Road over to the east side of the park and entered Many Glacier to hike to Lake Bullhead.
We saw much less wildlife this day. While some people reported seeing a bull moose near Lake Bullhead, we ended up not seeing any. We stopped by Fishercap Lake and ate lunch at Red Rock Falls on the way. Our son enjoyed tossing rocks into each of the lakes. We did see a few things, though.
| Green Comma butterfly |
| Paddle-tailed Darner |
| White-spotted Sawyer |
| Canada Jay |
So, while the previous days had highs of 60s and 70s, today had a high of 40F with rain and snow! We bought gloves and my wife bought a beanie from the gift shops in previous days in anticipation of this, and they definitely came in handy. We double-socked and brought a bunch of layers. The normal Grinnell Glacier trailhead was closed for repairs, so we parked at Many Glacier hotel around 6:25 AM (because we were worried about parking) and enjoyed breakfast inside the hotel before heading out.
I was looking forward to trying to spot some elk or moose at Swiftcurrent Lake or Lake Josephine, but sadly did not see any. Our back-up plan was to just hike to Lake Grinnell if things seemed too miserable, but we ended up deciding to stick with the glacier by the time the trail forked.
The cold rain turned to snow as we headed further up. We sort of had views, but obscured by fog and snow. The hike itself had nice varied terrain and interesting water features. My wife spotted a bighorn sheep sleeping in a field below:
There were some pine siskin foraging in the snow.
I'm normally a pretty slow hiker, slower than my wife and son, but I half jogged on the way back down just to generate heat. I did spot the bighorn sheep still in the field, now awake and eating. But it was extremely difficult for me to get any shots through the snow with my cold hands and this ended up being the best of the lot:
When I got back to Swiftcurrent Lake, the paved part of the trail, the people a couple dozen of feet in front of me started backing up and talking loudly about bears! There were two cubs and a parent sort of strolling on the path towards us and we had to back up quite a bit before they decided to cut across the plants and then cross the bridge across Swiftcurrent. As there were people in front of me with bear spray in hand, I took the opportunity to take some photos.
While the weather and lack of views were unfortunate, I felt like the hike through the snow was quite the adventure and the bear encounter was exciting.
We decided to end with Avalanche Lake and to take the shuttles again. Logan Pass was closed in the morning due to snow, so we figured everyone who wanted to go there would probably end up parking at Avalanche instead. Plus, we didn't want to get up super-early after the grueling experience yesterday and figured with the larger shuttles running to Avalanche compared to the small ones that go to Logan Pass that we wouldn't have to wait as long as we did last time.
We got to shuttle line around 9:20 AM and discovered that so many people were parking at Avalanche that many of them had improperly parked in the over-sized vehicle turn around loop and thus, they couldn't actually run the larger shuttles. Apparently, there's no tow trucks and it didn't sound like they even fine people who are improperly parked. Plus the reservation check line for Going-to-the-Sun was 20 minutes since they had to explain to everyone that Logan Pass was closed due to snow. We didn't get to Avalanche until 12:20 PM or so. But that still left plenty of time to do Trail of Cedars and Avalanche Lake to cap off our trip.
I didn't find the Trail of Cedars to be as wondrous as any of the previous hikes, but I appreciate there being a very accessible hike.
The Avalanche Lake hike was very nice. A lot of cool water features, woods, some views, and Avalanche Lake itself was very pretty.
| Creek |
On the way to the lake, we noticed a lot of people stopped looking into the woods, so we stopped to ask what was going on. Bears.
After waiting 10 minutes or so, the bears decided they wanted to cross the trail. The crowd of people parted ways like the Red Sea and backed up. It was a cub and a parent.
At the lake itself, we mostly saw birds. Our son played with rocks at the lake and we relaxed for a while before we headed back.
| Stellar Jay |
| American Dipper |
| ? were flying low and fast across the lake |
Since we had a flight in the afternoon, we took the time to relax in the indoor pool and hot tub of the community building the AirBnB belonged to and then walk around the Whitefish shops and eat lunch at Buffalo Cafe before taking our flight home. We accidentally navigated to the Kalispell airport before going to the correct one, but we had plenty of time to fix that. Our hiking poles also made it through as carry-on and our trip home was pleasantly uneventful.
Pictures were taken with a Sony a6400. All of the animal shots were taken with the Sony 70-350mm G, with shutter priority set to either 1/1000 or 1/1250. I also used a Cascade Mountain Tech trekking pole as a monopod, fitted with a Ulanzi U-80l mount. I carried the camera on a Peak Design clip attached to my backpack.
Both the Sony A6400 and Sony 80-350mm G are weather sealed and I took advantage of that in the Grinnell Glacier hike with all the snow and rain. So, it went through hours of rain and snow and did not seem any worse for the wear. I would not have managed to get pictures of the bears on the bridge if the camera were not readily accessible. However, when the hotshoe contacts got wet, I'd get annoying messages about incompatible accessories and would have to remove the hotshoe cover and dry it off a bit with my gloves. Luckily, this didn't happen when I chanced across the bears. I hear a piece of electric tape does pretty well to prevent this.
I'm happy to say that we've recently realized a long standing dream of mine: to be able to play D&D using physical minis and dice on a digital tabletop. This is a write-up describing the set up, in case it helps others considering something similar.
Here's a picture of the set up in gaming mode:
...and here it is in normal dining table form:
The key components:
With a TV, you need some way to level it and some plexiglass to protect the screen. I went with a case from digitaltabletops.com for around $525, as they seem to make it their business and are clear about which TVs they're sure their case works with. I would give them a 4/5:
The TV is a 43" Hisense A6H. It's relatively cheap at $240. It's the largest size that fits horizontally inside a wide Wyrmwood Modular Gaming Table with player desks on each side. It has wider than average viewing angles, which is more important for our use case than typical TV usage. It doesn't have a raised bezel on the top or sides, only the bottom, so there's not much of a gap between the plexiglass and the screen. It's 4K, which seems good considering how close people will be viewing it. It has Chromecast built-in, which can be handy for casting the maps from Chrome without needing to use an HDMI cable, but I've found that our network connectivity is not robust enough to avoid video compression artifacts.
Its main downsides of not being bright enough for usage in the sun or not having dark enough blacks for usage in the dark aren't relevant for our use case of playing in the evening with the lights on.
The table is a medium wide Wyrmwood Modular Gaming Table in rustic elm. It's one of those gaming tables with removable leaves and a vault to store ongoing board games, puzzles, and other similar things. For example, a television. My family is very happy with the table. It's beautiful, very solid, and perfect for this use case. There's plenty of reviews and videos about this table, so I'm going to avoid going over well-covered features and instead focus on some of the points that are specifically relevant for why we chose it, more subtle considerations, or things that surprised me.
This part is likely not relevant to most people, but it's the part I spent the most time planning around. It's figuring out the table layout.
Since our primary use case for using the gaming vault is D&D, we had the issue of needing to provide a surface for people's character sheets, laptops, and so on. Some of the options we discarded:
What I really wanted was to be able to keep some of the topper leaves on at the end. But the way they stay in place is with rubber studs intended to be at the corners of the table, so they only stay in place when all the topper leaves are installed and are quite loose otherwise.
So, what I ended up doing was putting some cabinet bumpers on the sides of the player desks and using the player desks to stop the toppers from moving. It's still not extremely secure this way--with enough force, the player desks can be moved sideways--but in practice it works just fine with our group. Others have suggested just using cabinet liners.
I did get one hobby vault for the DM. But so far, we haven't really needed to access the inside of it in the middle of a game. And it turns out if you leave two toppers on both sides of the table, the player desks with furniture bumpers fit in the middle pretty much perfectly resulting in all of the toppers being very secure:
This also gives more storage space overall. The downside would be inability to access this storage while stuff is on the toppers, as you'd have to lift it up vs sliding the hobby vault lid forward, and the increased height compared to just using the hobby vault. We'll be evaluating which set up we prefer.
Foundry VTT is pay $50 once software, which I prefer over subscriptions. Since my use case is playing locally, I don't need a hosting service. Foundry seems very popular and has a great variety of third-party content and modules, some of which make hybrid play with physical minis on a TV very easy. The key ones for me were:
One of the things that I like to do when I run games is to play music and sound effects, but it gets hectic to manage. Foundry supports automatically playing music when switching to a scene, and a module called Automated Animations supports automatically playing a matching sound when you roll an attack or cast a spell. JB2A is a module that can supply the animations and on their Discord is a link to a bunch of sounds.
I play Level Up Advanced 5th Edition (A5E) rather than D&D straight, and it turns out Foundry has gaming system support for it that seems already pretty complete and has active development. I hadn't realized that when I bought Foundry, but for that reason alone it's going to be hard to beat. But here were my thoughts on other options prior to buying Foundry:
These are just some notes I took when trying to figure out the differences between Level Up Advanced 5E (A5E) and original D&D 5E (O5E). They aren't necessarily complete or particularly organized, and I'll probably update this later.
So, there's the music sheets site that I'm subscribed to called MuseScore. I got an email from them on Dec. 8 with holiday music suggestions and this arrangement of "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch" by David Dinh caught my attention. I've been obsessing over it to get it presentable by Christmas, and while it's a bit on the sloppy side, I'm pretty happy to get this far after two weeks!